We all detest the price-gouging, bottom-feeding pharmaceutical bro. But, like most CEOs, hes unlikely to face real beating for his alleged misdeeds

The elves of schadenfreude would seem to have much to celebrate this vacation season with the report that the price-gouging pharmacy bro Martin Shkreli is in police incarceration, pending federal bills of defences fraud.

Shkreli, of course, rocketed into public infamy over recent reports that the bottom-feeding feeling he commands, Turing Medicines, had elected to hike the price of a 70 -year-old medication known as pyremethamine( used in the treatment of Aids and parasitic illness) from $1.50 to $750 per pill.

The self-infatuated 32 -year-old cretin who calls to mind a chilling alternate macrocosm in which Justin Bieber is a Hitler Youth leader was unscathed by the torrent of criticism and mistreat that came in the wake of this bout of unpleasant publicity.( It no doubt facilitated Shkreli to carry off his posture of Wall Street omnipotence that he hasnt at all been slowed down by the tedious work of actually fathoming just how the science of this dose ran .) He insisted that he was simply doing the market-savvy make repositioning that his stockholders expected from him.

And in a sense, Shkreli is right. Hes not facing federal prosecution for his gaudy, avaricious logic of the pharmaceutical cost point. In the mobbed-up nature of prescription for profit, there are no penalties for milking the final dime from a urgently sick patients cash substitutes. No, thats the splendid rent-seeking genius of our free-enterprise medical organisation, even after the progressive apparatchiks of the Obamacare regime got their grubby mitts on it.

Instead, Shkreli appears to have been hauled up on bills of C-suite chicanery, stemming from his earlier term at the helm of another dose firm announced Retrophin. The specifics of service charges will become clearer after the boyish CEOs formal arraignment, but there is, fortunately, an eye-popping civil suit pending against Shkreli for the many abuses he allegedly bounced on the guileless Retrophin board of directors.

Martin Shkreli, the contentious pharmaceutical entrepreneur, charged with fraud. Photo: Jb Nicholas/ Splash News/ Corbis

This suit contends that Shkreli used Retrophin as a virtual ATM machine to exempt cash and fellowship shares of disgruntled investors in Shkrelis erstwhile hedge-fund, hitherto another health-care cartel announced MSMB Capital.

The lawsuit alleges that Martin Shkreli, self-proclaimed master of the universe, launched his hedge-fund job with a disastrous belly flop: a cash-hemorrhaging trade with Merrill Lynch committing Orexigen Therapeutic, which was seeking to develop a new weight-loss dose. As a result of the Orex deal, MSMB Capital lost over$ 7m, and was virtually bankrupt, the Retrophin complaint alleges, before drily note: Shkreli did not tell his MSMB Capital investors that he had lost all their money as a result of the Orex Trade.

Instead, the nimble, fast-talking lout composed Retrophin and a company announced MSMB Healthcare shell business that allegedly composed the apparition of ongoing profitable Shkreli-led marketplace activity while also neatly redoubling as a provider of equity with which to pay off or otherwise placate MSMB Capital investors trying either their money back or, God forbid, a measure of right.

Toting up the broad display of elaborate stock issuances and cash payouts that Shkreli employed in engineering this shell game, the suit attempts $65 m in shatterings a comparatively modest summarize, given the scale of Shkrelis enterprise.

Against that backdrop, the flagrant price-gouging programme of Shreklis latest vesture, Turing, begin to make a sick sort of marketplace sense. Like a millennial Bernie Madoff, Martin Shkreli nearly has to kite fraudulent stock copes and other dubious means of advantage maximization to stave off the aggrieved detachment of ground-floor investors hes accused of initially confusing and defrauding.

But this is where a much longer-running, far sicker joke is poised to kick in the one known as federal criminal prosecution of large-scale financial malefactors. For all the short-term tabloid attention that Shkrelis prosecution is likely to garner, the peculiars against a absolutely satisfactory, Madoff-style turn in the hoosegow for our boy CEO are steep.

Thats because the law seek of financial titans is notoriously settlement and corrupted. University of Virginia rule prof Brandon L Garrett conducted an exhaustive subject of more than 2,000 criminal matters of business organizations from 2000 to 2012, and written research results in his recent eloquently entitled journal Too large to Jail.

Less than half of the 273 publicly traded houses facing criminal charges went through the motions of an actual trial, Garrett discovered; the remaining 54% of such companies either entered into cushy deferred prosecution copes generous, laxly enforced accordances to improve the culture of criminal malfeasance at the rebellious firm in question or simply skirted prosecution altogether.

Vocal NY and Act Up NY assert Martin Shkrelis moneymaking scheme on 1 October. Photo: Erik Mcgregor/ Demotix/ Corbis

And once these copes are impressed, the determine is genuinely in, financially expressing. Garrett calculates that criminal penalties extracted by the feds amount to just. 04% of the market capitalisation for those enterprises that enter into these agreements.( That would leave plenty of cash lying around for the bad-acting CEOs in question to spring for a secret Wu-Tang Clan CD, for example, or any number of other ego-flattering baubles .)

Garrett too reports that 40% of companies that were parties to deferred prosecution copes paid no fines whatsoever. All told, publicly traded houses which Turing and Retrophin are even out 58% of all deferred prosecution copes, and just 6% of the already small-scale consortium of criminally prosecuted business concerns.

It may well be, of course, that Martin Shkreli, thanks to his own big lip and unapologetic gaiety over shaking down sick beings for profit, supports to be an outlier in this cruel charade of right dished. But dont bet on it.

Way back in 2004, “prosecutors ” managed to secure the sentence of another fame investor and business mogul whom the American populace adoration to detest: Martha Stewart, whose pastel-clad rear end was parcelled off to the federal prison in Alderson, West Virginia on bills of insider trading involving a pharmaceutical fellowship announced ImClone.( That companys signature dose, Erbitux, which almost no one mentioned with repugnance at the time, had a marketing cost point of $1,000 per infusion .)

ImClones CEO Sam Waksal too did a brief tour behind tables, but the company continued to thrive, netting a cool $6.5 bn in a takeover by Eli Lilly. Waksal himself has brushed off his prison detour to found and command a biotech startup announced Kadmon Pharmaceuticals. Kadmon is currently orientation itself for an IPO which, under SEC conventions, has forced Waksal to surrender his CEO post to his brother Harlan. But the big programme has run aground among a lawsuit alleging yes defences fraud.

So gives not get too giddy over the specter of Martin Shkreli in an orange jumpsuit. Even in the unlikely episode that hes tried and imprisoned, the system is plainly set up for him to discover nothing at all from the experience.

Martin Shkreli, being led from courtroom.

Read more: www.theguardian.com